- LifeTwo. We're all about midlife.
- Sign up for our newsletter ...
- Listen to a LifeTwo podcast ...
- Learn about midlife crisis ...
- Help someone ...
- ... or visit our homepage for more.
- LifeTwo: the destination for information about midlife.
... Midlife Improvement
|
|
||
Search LifeTwo:Get Our Newsletter!Stay up to date on midlife issues -- subscribe to our monthly email newsletter (you can easily unsubscribe later)! Your LifeTwoIn this area, registered users see recommendations, set bookmarks, and track what their buddies are up to. For more on the benefits of registering, go here.
User loginThings You Can Do On LifeTwo
Subscribe in a Reader:Use the icon above to subscribe to LifeTwo's Home Page in a reader like My Yahoo or Google Reader (see this page to learn more about RSS and for information on our other feeds). Or if you use one of the following services, just click on its icon:
|
|||
|
|
New On LifeTwo's HomepageRecent DiscussionsRecent Comments |
||
The morally superior cheater; a Trappist monk's affair
Submitted by Wesley on December 10, 2007 - 9:11am.
Speaking in her blog about the writer Thomas Merton, who had been a Trappist monk in his twenties, Happiness-Project's Gretchen Rubin shares her surprise to have learned that he had an ongoing affair during the time he was a monk.
Gretchen then points us to a LiveScience article on the surprising relationship between moral superiority and unethical acts such as infidelity. The article notes that people who view themselves as morally superior can have the ability to rationalize immoral activities by focusing on the outcomes they expect to occur (for example rationalizing cheating on a test as a way of achieving their dream of becoming a doctor and helping people). The article further noted that a new study published in the November issue of the Journal of Applied Psychology researchers find that the worst of cheaters can be the same people who think of themselves as having the highest moral standards. If they see their place in the world as doing great good, then doing a few things not-so-good along the way isn't such a big deal. This is not to say that all people with self-described high morals are cheaters but it does help explain the Jim Bakkers and Ted Haggards of the world. Gretchen's reason for bringing this up was the dangers of pride. Our reason for citing it is in the difficulty of learning to trust others after being burned. If you've been let down by a partner (especially infidelity), the ability to ever trust them (or anyone else) is one of the more difficult things to accomplish. That's the real crime of the high-minded, do-gooders who fall so hard and so publicly. They send the message that if the high-minded are cheating then everyone lower than them on the moral totem pole must be doing it as well. Oddly however the truth might be exactly the opposite. Read Similar LifeTwo Stories:
Find More By Clicking On These Links:Actions »
|
|||
|   |   |   |   |
|
|
Thomas Merton as morally superior?
I think anyone who has read Merton's writings would realize that he was not in the least morally superior. He certainly never considered himself to be so. If anything, his writings are filled with his acceptance of moral frailty, his own and other's. Not sure the shoe fits in this case...
Moral Superiority
You are no doubt correct. Gretchen said that she was surprised about Merton's affair and then went on to talk about moral superiority in general. She did not say that he had cast himself in this light nor did we, which is good because based on your comment he never did. Others have however and it appears that many of them fall victim to doing so--possibly for the reasons laid out in the LiveScience article.
Thanks for your comment.
Wesley Hein
Wesley [at] lifetwo [dot] com
Sign up for the LifeTwo Newsletter!
Post new comment