|
|
|||
... Midlife Improvement
|
|
||
Search LifeTwo:Get Our Newsletter!Stay up to date on midlife issues -- subscribe to our monthly email newsletter (you can easily unsubscribe later)! Visit Our Store!Visit our store at Amazon to see books and other products we recommend -- like this: Your LifeTwoIn this area, registered users see recommendations, set bookmarks, and track what their buddies are up to. For more on the benefits of registering, go here. User loginThings You Can Do On LifeTwo
Follow us on Twitter and get tweets when new posts go up! Click on the Twitter logo to go to our page at Twitter, and then click the "follow" button. Subscribe in a Reader:Use the icon above to subscribe to LifeTwo's Home Page in a reader like My Yahoo or Google Reader (see this page to learn more about RSS and for information on our other feeds). Or if you use one of the following services, just click on its icon:
|
|||
New On LifeTwo's HomepageRecent DiscussionsRecent Comments |
|||
How every major media outlet is mis-handling the 'Stress-Obesity' story; The danger of waiting for the "Patented" magic pill
Submitted by Wesley on July 2, 2007 - 4:23pm.
Stress + “comfort” foods = excess weight gain Virtually every major news organization is reporting on a press release issued by Georgetown University Medical Center ("Scientists discover key to manipulating fat"). In our opinion, all of them are botching the story. A sampling of headlines:
Stress can be fattening, study finds (Los Angeles Times) Way to Shrink, Grow Fat Is Found (Washington Post) Drug could move bum fat to breasts (Melbourne Herald Sun) Scientists discover how stress leads to obesity (Daily Mail) The news contained in the Georgetown press release (self-described by the researchers as a "stunning research advance") is that they have succeeded in using simple, non-toxic chemical injections to add and remove fat in targeted areas on the bodies of laboratory animals. They also found that "stressed mice on high calorie diets gained twice as much fat as unstressed mice on the same diet. The novel and unexpected finding was that when stressed and non-stressed animals ate the same high calorie foods, the stressed animals utilized and stored fat differently." This can be summarized as eating junk food is bad, eating junk food when stressed is worse. Professor Zofia Zukowska of Georgetown University was quoted in the release saying:
The most stunning part of the release is the ignorant manner in which it perpetuates the obesity epidemic. The Georgetown professors and every single media outlet reporting on the findings appear to believe that obesity (and presumably stress) is solely a pharmaceutical problem requiring a pharmaceutical solution. Not a single major outlet covering the issue suggested that instead of waiting years for the potential development/approval of a drug that people work on reducing stress in their lives as well as the consumption of junk food in dealing with such stresses. None of the media outlets mentioned exercise, meditation, yoga, proper diet, counseling, stress coping skills, walks, etc. Worse, should a pharmaceutical product be developed it would reduce one of the big motivators people have for adopting a more healthy lifestyle. The proposed drug would reduce fat cells but that is only one aspect of maintaining a lifestyle that includes exercise and a proper diet. It's not all about weight and calories. The underlying message from the researchers basically is saying:
Some people smoke cigarettes to deal with stress and we tell them they should stop smoking. Isn't eating junk food the same thing? Evidently not in the eyes of the Georgetown researchers and the media outlets covering them. A cynic might attribute this to the report that the researchers have applied for a patent for a drug based on this work and have already begun negotiating with drug companies to license the technology. The absolute worst possible outcome of their publicity push is that people will believe the futility of given maintaining proper body weight given the stresses of modern life and will wait for big pharm to develop a pill that will allow them to look the way they want while maintaining an exceptionally unhealthy lifestyle. Read Similar LifeTwo Stories:
Find More By Clicking On These Links:Actions »
|
|||
|   |   |   |   |
|
|
Waiting for drugs to work
You are absolutely right. We are all waiting for the pill or procedure that will reduce fat with little or no effort on our part. (I'm including myself in this group.) The gastric bypass was just the beginning.
I was in Walgreen's the other day and two women bought Alli, and another inquired about it. They may have been overweight, but certainly not obese. All they had to say to keep me away was "oily leakage."
Post Clarification
I have just spent the last few hours discussing my position with some of the editors and writers whom I emailed with my concerns. I was both pleased and surprised at the number of members of mainstream media who took the time to respond to my queries.
I am 100% behind the effort going into obesity research and much good can come from their work--including drugs. There are certainly physiological issues that make it hard for many people to control their weight. But to write an article (as every major newspaper did) talking about how junk food can lead to obesity when stress is present and to not even mention the reduction of junk food as an option is a disservice to their readers. The article could easily have been "drugs to help obesity are years away so to improve health, quality of life, and longevity, people will need to figure out ways to reduce stress and improve diet." While this is less sensational and will less fewer newspapers, it is far more accurate and responsible.
Wesley Hein
Wesley [at] lifetwo [dot] com
Sign up for the LifeTwo Newsletter!
Bravo Wesley - this is a
Bravo Wesley - this is a critical issue. Thank you for shifting the focus from the symptoms to the cause. Stress and the resulting inflammation reaction is killing us. The place to work is on addressing the physical, emotional and environmental stressors and our relationship to them. Thanks!
Sorry - that was from Dave
Sorry - that was from Dave Schoof from www.thedisquiet.com
Thanks Dave!
For those of you who don't know, among other things Dave's career is built around helping executives foster an environment that minimizes unnecessary stress in the workplace. So it makes our day when he chimes in with a compliment in an area of his expertise.
Post new comment