Skip navigation.

... Midlife Improvement

Search LifeTwo:

Get Our Newsletter!

Stay up to date on midlife issues -- subscribe to our monthly email newsletter (you can easily unsubscribe later)!

Email address:

Visit Our Store!

Visit our store at Amazon to see books and other products we recommend -- like this:

Your LifeTwo

In this area, registered users see recommendations, set bookmarks, and track what their buddies are up to. For more on the benefits of registering, go here.

User login

Advertising Supplied By:

twitter_logo

Follow us on Twitter and get tweets when new posts go up! Click on the Twitter logo to go to our page at Twitter, and then click the "follow" button.

Subscribe in a Reader:

XML feed

Use the icon above to subscribe to LifeTwo's Home Page in a reader like My Yahoo or Google Reader (see this page to learn more about RSS and for information on our other feeds). Or if you use one of the following services, just click on its icon:

Add to Google

Add to My Yahoo!

Add to My AOL


New On LifeTwo's Homepage

Recent Discussions

The Surge in Midlife Divorce

Greg's picture

Divorce used to be something that happened to people well before they turned 40. No longer. The most-divorced group in the U.S. population is well into middle age.

Does that mean we'll see more midlife crises ... and the sometimes embarassing behavior that goes with it?

One thing is sure: the increase in midlife divorce is a significant and under-reported trend.

In 1979 the most-divorced age groups were men 30-34 and women 35-44. Now for both men and women it's 45-54 year olds. In 2000, the most recent year for which good data is available, almost 15% of men and 18% of women in that age group were divorced. About another 2.4% of men and 3.1% of women were separated.

The groups on either side -- 35-44 and 55-64 -- are tied for second highest, with about 15% of men and 18% of women in each separated or divorced.

That is far more people who are middle aged and divorced than we've ever seen in this country.

Our chart below shows the change from 1979, when there were fewer and younger divorced people, to the turn of the millennium. The curves are the percentage of people in each age group who are divorced.

200608031359
(click on the image for a larger version in a new window)

You can see that since 1979, about the same percentage of people in their early 30's and younger are divorced. But far more middle aged people -- 2x to 3x -- are divorced now.

That data is based on the last census, but the news since 2000 may be no better. Data on the number of divorces is collected in the U.S. only by the states and not recorded centrally. But looking across the Atlantic, in the last several years the UK has seen a surge in midlife divorces. While the overall number of divorces per 1,000 married people increased 2.4% from 2000 to late 2005, for 35-44 year olds it rose 12.9% (to almost 22 divorces per 1,000 married people) and for 45+ rose 19.2% (to 6.2 per 1,000).

The UK stats also show something missing in U.S. data: median age at time of divorce. In 1981 the median age for women was 31; now it's a few months shy of 40. For men it was 35; in 2005 it was 42.

The U.S. numbers reflect a similar trend. That's a significant change.

A recent article about a spate of celebrity midlife divorces in the UK rounded up some speculation on causes:

- later marriage means later divorce;

- longevity: at 45, people are now facing another 40 years with their spouse rather than 20 or so a few generations ago. They don't want forty years of unhappiness and they may think they can have a second chance with someone else;

- increased attention to personal happiness means less willingness to stay in a bad marriage;

- women are less financially dependent on men.

All fall into the category of "interesting hypothesis" or at most "correlation" rather than solidly proven precipitating factor.

Some of the impacts we expect: more complicated divorces; more middle-aged dating; more intricate family relationships.

What about more midlife crises? It's a possibility. Divorce is popularly thought to be a trigger for midlife crisis. Although the notion of "midlife crisis" is fuzzy and hard to distinguish from "a crisis in midlife," a significant emotional trauma like divorce can lead to depression or re-evaluation or any of the many other behaviors and changes commonly lumped under the rubric "midlife crisis."

So, yes, this surge in midlife divorce should lead to an increased number of transiently (we hope) unhappy people -- but perhaps to more people determined to make up for lost time and make themselves happier. Perhaps something good will come out of this after all.

---
Data sources:
US:
2000 Census Table 51
Statistical Abstract of the U.S. 1979
Census 2000 Brief: Marital Status
UK:
Statistics.UK.gov Table 9.3

0
 
 

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
Anonymous's picture

It took a while to get it right

As a thrice-divorced woman, I am part of the statistical base. I divorced at 24, 33 and 47. (O.K. I'm a slow learner.) For me, it took that long to understand what my true issues were and that deciding to marry was a way of not looking at the problems within myself. Once I fixed me instead of trying to fix everyone else, I finally got it right. At 49, I met the man I am now -- happily -- married to. And, yes, I can see spending the next 40-50 years of my life with him!
Casey Dawes
www.wisewomanshining.com

Anonymous's picture

Surge in Midlife Divorce

Have any studies ever been conducted comparing the surge in mid-life divorce to: 1. the rise in no-fault divorce laws across our country? 2. prevalence of websites like Match.com?

My husband, Peter, now the president and CEO of a large Canadian company, walked away from our 21-year marriage to marry a woman that he met online. I tried valiantly to save our marriage, begging my husband to go through meaningful counseling with me but Washington State divorce laws allowed him to walk away with minimal financial pain.

In contrast, after supporting my husband’s career during his stellar climb up the corporate ladder as his stay-at-home wife and mother to our children with no formal job training, I was granted just four years of alimony after which time I will be expected to make my way in the world. As I sit here tonight very much alone and seriously in debt acquired while trying to earn a teaching credential, I can't help but wonder if our marriage would have survived had my husband’s infidelity and the drastic difference in our earning capacity been taken into account in a court of law?

Michelle Vinall

Anonymous's picture

the surge

I think we're in a day when enough is "not enough." We're being condition to clamor for more, the next best thing bells and whistles. The latest cell phone, a wider screen tv, a boob job, etc. My wife cited all material things as the reason she was leaving our marriage. At the time we lived in a $800,000 house! Received 11 offers when we put it on the market and sold it for $20,000 above asking. It blew up when I wanted to budget money rather than taking out an equity loan to remodel the bathroom. Go figure. The same year we go on a vacation and she rents an SUV to drive 300 miles to a beach house we rented. The thing was parked for a week yet we paid $600 for the rental. She pouted for two years and refused to talk out our issues. Plain refused. Meanwhile she wakes up at night with the alibi that she is working. She was really contacting men on the internet and then calling them on her cell phone. Later whe went to match.com as a married woman looking for erotic sex. I don't blame internt sites. My wife had issues. The internet does, however, make it so easy for people to retreat and find a type of sick release. My wife was able to find people who were as messed up as she was. She didn't have to be responsible to the marriage because, in a sense, she had already divorced me and remarried strangers in cyberspace. It's sick on many levels, especially the lying. She posted on match.com that she was athletic and worked out 3 days a week. A lie. She also wore an outfit that girdled her mid-section and pushed up her boobs to Dolly Partonish proportions. She's really about 30 pounds overweight.

But her logic was: "Why work constructively with my husband on our marriage when I can just tap a keyboard and troll for men the sewer for my man." Sadly, I think there are tons of people like her. Much easier to "escape" into an imagined utopia with Mr./Ms. Wonderful and not deal with the real world. Talk dirty, create fantasies and feel the thrill of secrecy. This is a woman who is co-chairman of the Christian Education Committee at her church. Yes, we did divorce. After a tough year it is shaping up to be a good development in my life. I've also adjusted and feel pretty healthy about moving on. I just think first marriages are very tough in these times. There are too many unhealthy variables, many more than before, pulling people away from a contented lifestyole with integrity. I think the best chances for a good marriage, for some people, is the second time around. You've grown and you've also developed a sixth sense about your mate. I'm sorry about your sitauion and wish you well.

Anonymous's picture

Material things

Don't blame your divorce/wife's behavior on the need for material things, the internet or any other thing outside of the both of you. The simple and plain truth is that you married a woman who has mental problems. If it hadn't been the internet, it would have been something else, believe me. All behaviors stem from what's going on inside our heads. They are not caused by material objects. Anyone who has his or her head screwed on straight is not going to do what your wife did, no matter what's going on in society. But, it's just easier for you to avoid placing the blame squarely on her shoulders. My advice: choose much more wisely the next time around.

Post new comment

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.